WMD - free the world
Nuclear Disarmament

How Safe Are We?

click here

WMD - free the world
Nuclear Disarmament


Visit Us on Facebook.


Visit Us on YouTube.

Daisy Newsletter
June 2010
Daisy Alliance is a nonpartisan peace organization that educates the public about the devastation nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons are capable of inflicting and the threat they pose to civilization. We work to improve global peace and security by reducing the threat or use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) through the rule of international law. 
Singing for Peace

Check out award winning songwriter Eric Colville's "End of War" on YouTube! 
 
"End of War" is a beautiful and inspirational song of peace. Colville honors both civilian and military casualites of war, and promotes a message of global unity to end war and make peace. This song is an excellent medium to spread the message of peace and to inspire a new generation of activists. The music video is also available at no charge for non-profit use.  
 
 
Support Nuclear Abolition

Activists around the world celebrated Nuclear Abolition Day on June 5th to maintain the momemtum and support for a nuclear weapons free world following the NPT Review Conference. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon released a video message in support of this day of global action. 
 
Help keep the momentum going by continuing to take action this summer. There are several things you can do to support the cause.
 
The second session of the Conference on Disarmament is currently in session. Contact your Geneva UN Representative and call on them to negotiate a fissile material cutoff treaty.
 
Call on U.S. President Obama to support negotiations for a Nuclear Weapons Convention.
 
Call on your U.S. Senator to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
 
You can also work within your community to build support. Contact Daisy Alliance for action ideas.
 
Let's make this a summer of action!
 
 
 

                         Features

Going Rogue - How Many Nukes Can You Build?

Critics of nuclear disarmament argue that a world free of nuclear weapons decreases international peace and security. "If nukes are outlawed, only rogue states will have them." Without a nuclear deterrent, there is nothing to stop "rogue" states from cheating. Since the knowledge to build a nuke exists, a cheating nation could secretly build a nuclear weapon and hold the world hostage. Proponents of disarmament say that technology exists that would detect a cheating state.

Cheater's Risk (created by the Stimson Center) is an interactive exploration of a world without nuclear weapons. The player steps into the role of a country seeking to gain the advantage of a monlpoly on nuclear weapons and must avoid being detected by national intelligence services and international monitors. This virtual game provides a good understanding of what it actually takes to develop nuclear weapons and how difficult it is to do so without detection. A great learning tool for people of all ages!

Global Casualites

International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) published a briefing paper in March 2010 on the global climate and health effects of nuclear war. The paper, "Zero is the Only Option," examines four medical and enviromental case studies on nuclear famine, a nuclear ozone hole, nuclear winter, and the casualites of nuclear war. Each case study draws on work conducted by climate scientists, including Alan Robock, O.B. Toon, and Michael Mills.

Produced for the NPT Review Conference, "Zero is the Only Option" makes a strong case for the inherent global dangers of nuclear weapons, not just from a security standpoint, but from the longterm perspective of climate and health. This paper provides excellent insight into the collective need for rapid policy change.

 
Review Conference Update
 
After four weeks of meetings and debate, the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) 2010 Review Conference ended on May 28. Daisy Alliance's op-ed this month, "The NPT 2010 Review Conference-On Review," analyzes the final document and discusses whether we can really consider this Review Conference to be a success.
 
The Review Conference is held every five years to assess the implementation of the treaty and to make substantive progress on global nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament. The 2005 Review Conference failed dismally, with states parties unable to agree on procedural issues, let alone make any substantive progress. Hopes were high among both states parties and international civil society that this year's Review Conference would be successful.
 
Debate was heated, but in the end, states parties did agree on a final document. But can we consider simply achieving consensus a success?
 
While the final document reaffirms the principles of the treaty and the commitments of states parties to total disarmament, it primarily maintains the status quo. Most people in the arms control community consider this a modest success, as there was little substantive progress on issues of disarmament and nonproliferation.

Suite 830 • 990 Hammond Drive • Atlanta, Georgia 30328 USA
Copyright ©2005-2010. Bruce A. Roth. All rights reserved.
Website Hosting by Clearbuilt Technologies
Support disarmament and nuclear nonproliferation and stop WMDs.