|
 Visit Us on Facebook.
 Visit Us on YouTube.
|
Interviews
People Who Make a Difference in Arms Control
Peter Kuznick, November 20, 2009
Professor of History at American University in Washington D.C. and
director of the university's Nuclear Studies Institute, Dr. Peter
Kuznick dispels the popular belief that using atomic bombs on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki brought about the prompt surrender of Japan and the early
conclusion of World War II, thus saving millions of lives that would
have been lost in an invasion of Japan. He explains that atomic bombs
neither ended the war nor were necessary to avoid an invasion of Japan.
Dr. Kuznick also talks about the ten part documentary movie he is making
with Oliver Stone, winner of three Academy Awards. The movie, titled
The Secret History of the United States, will be released next year.
|
Richard L. Garwin, June 28, 2009
Renowned physicist, Richard L. Garwin, is a recipient of the
National Medal of Science, the nation's highest honor in science and engineering.
Dr. Garwin designed the first hydrogen bomb while working under Dr.
Edward Teller at Los Alamos. Although Dr. Garwin is a continuing
contributor to military technology, he is an outspoken advocate of
nuclear arms control. In this interview, he describes his role in
developing the hydrogen bomb and shares his views on Anti-Ballistic
Missile systems, the future of nuclear power, and the threat of
terrorist use of nuclear weapons acquired from North Korea, Pakistan, or
Russia. He also discusses the "Reykjavik-2" initiative, a renewed
vision of a world free of nuclear weapons that was shared by President
Ronald Reagan and General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev during their 1986
summit in Reykjavik, Iceland.
|
Martin E. Hellman, June 8, 2009
Dr. Martin Hellman, Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University, is best known for his invention of public key cryptography, a technology used to securely make Internet credit card purchases. His current interest in nuclear arms control focuses on applying risk analysis to our traditional approach to preventing the use of nuclear weapons-nuclear deterrence. Hellman explains that the risk we face from reliance on nuclear weapons to deter an attack by aggressors is comparable to having your home surrounded by thousands of nuclear power plants. More than just discuss this problem, he proposes simple, practical, and effective steps that anyone can take to help avert a nuclear catastrophe.
|
Jan Eliasson, April 6, 2009
One of the top peace negotiators in the world, Eliasson has served as Sweden's Foreign Minister and its Ambassador to the U.N. He was the U.N.'s first Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and President of the U.N. General Assembly. Most recently, he was the U.N. Secretary-General's Special Envoy to Darfur, Sudan. Currently he is a Senior Scholar at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington D.C. Eliasson discusses the much needed reform at the U.N. and the tension that exists between individual human rights and sovereignty of nation-states, and he shares his four keys to successful mediation.
|
C. Uday Bhaskar, Feb. 10, 2009
Director of the Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses in New Delhi, Commodore Bhaskar has also been appointed Member-Secretary of the Government of India Task Force on Global Strategic Developments, and is considered one of the world's top defense analysts. Commodore Bhaskar explains why he believes the controversial U.S.-India nuclear deal will be good for nonproliferation and adds his perspective on the Mumbai terror attacks, Pakistan, the disputed state of Kashmir, and the freeing of A.Q. Khan.
|
Gareth Evans and Jan Lodal, Feb. 16, 2009
Evans is the President of the International Crisis Group, and Lodal is the immediate past President of the Atlantic Council of the United States. Evans and Lodal cover issues such as the international nuclear disarmament agenda, the Obama administration's commitment to a nuclear weapons free world, the urgency of nuclear disarmament, and the feasibility of zero nuclear weapons.
|
Robert J. O'Neill, AO, Jan. 5, 2009
Professor Emeritus of the History of War at Oxford University, O'Neill tells why he changed his mind about the need for nuclear weapons as a deterrent and now believes that they must be completely eliminated. He describes what types of security arrangements might substitute for nuclear weapons and facilitate the goal of global disarmament. He discusses potential "rogue states," such as Iran and North Korea and the prospects for peace in the Middle East. O'Neill points out what lessons the U.S. could learn from history and offers some advice to President Elect Obama. O'Neill was Chairman of the Council of the International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS), Chairman of the Trustees for the Imperial War Museum in London, and a member of the Canberra Commission on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons.
|
Bruce Roth Interviews
Bruce Roth Interviewed on Business to Business Magazine. January, 2009
|
Bruce Roth Interviewed on "Following Your Passions" January 15, 2008 © Radio Sandy Springs
Bruce Roth Interviewed on "Following Your Passions" May 16, 2007 © Radio Sandy Springs
Bruce Roth Interviewed on "Following Your Passions" August 2, 2005 © Radio Sandy Springs
|
|